Minnesota Prosecutors Battle Federal Government Over Evidence in Immigration Shooting Deaths
State officials sue to access basic information about three shootings by federal agents during Minneapolis immigration crackdown, including two fatalities.
Minnesota state prosecutors have filed a lawsuit against the federal government seeking access to evidence related to three shootings by federal immigration agents in Minneapolis, including two incidents that resulted in fatalities. The legal action highlights an extraordinary standoff between state and federal authorities over accountability for the use of force during an aggressive immigration enforcement operation.
The Hennepin County Attorney's Office filed the suit in federal court on Tuesday, arguing that the Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement had refused to provide basic information needed to investigate the shootings, including the identities of the agents involved, body camera footage, and incident reports.
The shootings occurred over a two-week period in early March during what ICE described as a targeted enforcement operation in the Minneapolis metropolitan area. Two of the incidents resulted in deaths, while a third left an individual seriously wounded. Federal authorities have provided minimal public information about any of the three events.
Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty said at a press conference that her office had a legal obligation to investigate any death caused by use of force within her jurisdiction, regardless of whether the force was applied by local, state, or federal officers. She said the federal government's refusal to cooperate was unprecedented in her experience.
The Department of Homeland Security did not respond to requests for comment on the lawsuit. ICE had previously said only that its agents acted in accordance with established use of force policies and that internal reviews of the incidents were underway.
The shootings have inflamed tensions in Minneapolis, a city still bearing the legacy of the 2020 killing of George Floyd by a local police officer. Community organizations have held vigils for the two individuals who were killed, and local elected officials have demanded transparency from federal authorities.
Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey said the city had not been informed in advance of the scale of the federal immigration operation and that local police had not been involved in the incidents. He expressed support for the county attorney's lawsuit and called on the federal government to provide a full accounting of what occurred.
The legal dispute raises complex questions about the intersection of federal immigration enforcement authority and state criminal jurisdiction. While federal agents generally enjoy certain legal protections when acting in their official capacity, legal experts said those protections do not exempt them from state criminal investigations into potential excessive use of force.
Minnesota Governor Tim Walz weighed in on the dispute, calling the federal government's stonewalling unacceptable and directing the state attorney general to support the county's legal action. Walz said that regardless of immigration policy disagreements, every person in Minnesota was entitled to the protection of state law.
Civil rights organizations have filed their own legal actions seeking information about the shootings through the Freedom of Information Act, though those requests are typically subject to lengthy processing times. The ACLU of Minnesota said the federal government's refusal to share evidence suggested it had something to hide.
The standoff in Minnesota is part of a broader national pattern of friction between state and local authorities and the federal government over the conduct of immigration enforcement operations. Similar disputes over transparency and accountability have arisen in several other cities where aggressive enforcement actions have been carried out.
Originally reported by NYT.